This post concerns the effects that whaling by countries
such as Japan are having in Antarctica. A recent BBC article has
reported that as of November 2015 Japan has resumed whaling in Antarctica after
an interval of over a year. Although Japan has stated that the whaling is
purely scientific, most of the whales caught are used in the food industry, not
for research purposes. The decision to recommence whaling comes after the ICJ
(International Court of Justice) ruled that Japan should discontinue all
whaling. Despite Japan reducing its minke whaling quota by 2/3 to 333, any
whales killed is seen as an ecological disaster. Butman's 1995 journal article explains that without organic matter from whales, deep sea species that rely on falling whale carcasses will have no other viable food source which will put a strain on the whole ecosystem and marine biodiversity.
The ICJ ruling has criticised
Japan for killing whales scientifically and has stated that there is no need to
kill whales in order to scientifically study them. The International Whaling Commission (IWC), which
purpose is to promote conservation in whaling, strongly argues against whaling
taking place in Antarctica. The organisation encourages sustainability and has
assisted in helping whale numbers to rise globally due to the protection of
species such as the blue whale. However, despite the IWC suspending all
commercial whaling in 1986, it still continues today as previously mentioned by
countries such as Japan.
Figure 1: A whale being hunted (source)
Personally, I feel that all whaling should be halted in
order to preserve these magnificent creatures and maintain the health of the
ecosystems that whales are a part of.
Very interesting to know the science of why whaling is actually ecologically destructive rather than just a moral obligation to stop! Do you think there are any international bodies that could effectively enforce a whaling ban? Why aren't there any negative consequences for them basically ignoring the ICJ?
ReplyDelete